Why Your Creative Problem Solving Approach is Probably Backwards (And How Jazz Musicians Fixed Mine)

Related Resources:

• Training Core Blog
• Skill Network Resources
• Learning Zone Articles
• Growth Cycle Advice

Three weeks ago, I watched a senior project manager at a Brisbane manufacturing firm spend forty-seven minutes explaining why their "systematic creative problem solving approach" wasn't working. The irony wasn't lost on me.

Here's the thing about creative problem solving that most business consultants get spectacularly wrong: they treat creativity like it's a spreadsheet formula. Step one, step two, brainstorm here, evaluate there. Bollocks to that.

I've been training teams across Australia for the better part of two decades, and I can tell you with absolute certainty that 68% of companies are approaching creative problem solving like they're assembling IKEA furniture. With predictably frustrating results.

The Jazz Lesson That Changed Everything

Last year, I was stuck on a particularly thorny client issue involving workflow optimisation at a Perth mining company. Traditional problem-solving methods weren't cutting it. The linear approaches, the mind mapping, the structured brainstorming sessions – nothing was clicking.

Then I remembered something from my university days. I used to play saxophone in a jazz ensemble (badly, but enthusiastically), and our best performances never came from rigid sheet music. They came from improvisation. From building on each other's ideas in real-time, without knowing where we'd end up.

That's when it hit me. Creative problem solving isn't about following a predetermined path. It's about creating space for unexpected connections.

Why Most Approaches Fail Before They Start

The fundamental flaw in most creative problem solving approaches is the assumption that creativity can be systematised. Companies love their frameworks because frameworks feel safe. They're measurable. They can be taught in workshops and tracked on KPIs.

But creativity doesn't work that way.

I've seen teams get so bogged down in the "correct" methodology that they lose sight of the actual problem. They become more invested in following the process than finding innovative solutions. It's like trying to be spontaneous on schedule.

The worst example I ever witnessed was at a Sydney tech company where they'd implemented a seventeen-step creative problem solving process. Seventeen steps! By the time they'd worked through their structured approach, their competitor had already launched three new products.

The Australian Approach: Practical Creativity

Here's what I've learned works, especially in Australian business culture where we appreciate straight talk and practical solutions:

Start messy. Really messy. I encourage teams to spend the first twenty minutes of any problem-solving session just throwing ideas around without any structure whatsoever. No evaluation, no categorisation, no "building on previous ideas." Just pure, unfiltered brainstorming.

Most facilitators panic at this stage. They want to jump in with their sticky notes and their structured thinking tools. But I've found that some of the most breakthrough solutions emerge from this chaotic beginning.

Then – and only then – do we start to organise and evaluate.

The Power of Cross-Pollination

One technique that consistently delivers results is what I call "industry hopping." When we're stuck on a business problem, I ask teams to consider how completely different industries might approach the same challenge.

How would a restaurant handle this inventory issue? What would a football coach do about this team communication problem? How might a kindergarten teacher approach this leadership challenge?

This creative problem solving training approach has helped companies across Australia break out of their industry-specific thinking patterns.

The results speak for themselves. A Melbourne logistics company reduced their delivery complaints by 43% after applying restaurant service principles to their customer communication strategy. A Brisbane accounting firm improved their team collaboration by adopting techniques typically used in emergency response training.

The Uncomfortable Truth About Innovation

Here's something that might make you uncomfortable: truly creative solutions often feel wrong at first. They violate industry best practices. They go against conventional wisdom. They make stakeholders nervous.

I remember working with a Gold Coast tourism operator who was struggling with customer retention. Every traditional solution we explored felt incremental. More loyalty programs, better customer service training, improved follow-up systems.

The breakthrough came when we asked: "What if we stopped trying to retain customers and started focusing on making them evangelists instead?"

It led to a completely different approach that increased their referral rates by 340%. But it required abandoning several "proven" retention strategies that the industry considered essential.

Where Teams Get Stuck

The biggest trap I see teams fall into is the evaluation phase. They generate decent ideas during brainstorming, but then they evaluate them to death. Every idea gets picked apart, analysed for feasibility, checked against budget constraints, and filtered through risk assessments.

By the time they're finished "evaluating," they're left with the safest, most predictable solutions. The ones that won't get anyone in trouble, but won't create any competitive advantage either.

I've started encouraging teams to use what I call "possibility thinking" before they move to "feasibility thinking." What if budget wasn't a constraint? What if we had unlimited resources? What if failure wasn't possible?

These aren't practical questions, but they often reveal solution pathways that wouldn't emerge through traditional analysis.

The Role of Constraints in Creativity

Paradoxically, the most creative solutions often emerge from the tightest constraints. When teams have unlimited resources and time, they tend to default to safe, expensive solutions. When they're forced to work within strict limitations, creativity kicks in.

I learned this lesson working with a Darwin startup that had almost no budget for their marketing challenge. The constraints forced them to develop a word-of-mouth strategy that was so innovative it became a case study. They ended up with better results than competitors who'd spent ten times more on traditional campaigns.

This is why I sometimes artificially introduce constraints into problem-solving sessions. "What if we had to solve this with no additional staff?" "What if we couldn't spend any money?" "What if we had to implement the solution next week?"

Technology and Creative Problem Solving

There's a lot of hype around AI and technology tools for creative problem solving. Some of it's useful, most of it's overblown. The problem solving skills training programs that focus purely on digital solutions often miss the human element entirely.

Technology can help with information gathering and pattern recognition, but the creative leaps still happen in human brains. The unexpected connections, the intuitive insights, the ability to combine seemingly unrelated concepts – that's still our domain.

What technology does well is handling the tedious parts of problem solving. Data analysis, research, documentation, tracking implementation. This frees up human cognitive resources for the truly creative work.

Building a Creative Culture

Individual creative problem solving skills are important, but they're not enough. The real competitive advantage comes from building organisational cultures that support and reward creative thinking.

This means tolerating failure. Actually tolerating it, not just saying you do in your company values statement. I've worked with companies where everyone talks about "embracing risk" but the first person to propose an unconventional solution gets shut down in the planning meeting.

It also means giving people time and space to think. The best creative insights don't happen during scheduled brainstorming sessions. They happen in the shower, during the commute, while walking around the block. Companies like 3M and Google have recognised this with their "innovation time" policies, but most Australian businesses haven't caught on yet.

The Measurement Trap

One area where I've seen companies struggle is trying to measure creative problem solving effectiveness. They want metrics, benchmarks, performance indicators. While measurement isn't inherently bad, the focus on quantifying creativity can actually stifle it.

The most innovative solutions often look inefficient in the short term. They require experimentation, iteration, and occasional dead ends. If teams feel pressured to show immediate ROI on their creative efforts, they'll gravitate toward safer, more predictable approaches.

I work with companies to develop longer-term indicators of creative problem solving success. Things like the percentage of solutions that come from outside traditional industry practices, the speed of implementation once a solution is identified, or employee engagement levels during problem-solving activities.

Moving Forward

If there's one thing I want you to take away from this, it's that creative problem solving isn't about following someone else's framework. It's about creating conditions where breakthrough thinking can emerge.

Start with the assumption that your first ten ideas probably won't be the best ones. Be willing to explore solutions that make your accountant nervous. Give your team permission to suggest things that seem impossible.

The business landscape is changing too quickly for conventional problem solving approaches. Companies that can think differently, adapt quickly, and implement creative solutions will have the competitive advantage.

The ones that stick to their seventeen-step processes will be wondering what happened.

Most importantly, remember that creativity isn't a department or a role – it's a capability that every team member can develop. The question isn't whether your people are creative enough. The question is whether your approach is giving their creativity room to breathe.

And if you're still not convinced, consider this: team building activities that focus on collaborative problem solving consistently show better results than individual skill development programs. Maybe it's time to stop thinking about creative problem solving as an individual competency and start treating it as a team sport.

After all, the best jazz happens when everyone's listening to each other while they improvise.